Philosopher of science Dean Rickles says that, "the consensus among philosophers seems to be that special and general relativity are incompatible with presentism." Christian Wüthrich argues that supporters of presentism can only salvage absolute simultaneity if they reject either empiricism or relativity. Many philosophers have argued that relativity implies eternalism. There is no physical basis for a set of events that represents the present. The causal past and causal future are consistent within all frames of reference, but any other time is "elsewhere", and within it there is no present, past, or future. However, there are events that may be non-simultaneous in all frames of reference: when one event is within the light cone of another-its causal past or causal future-then observers in all frames of reference show that one event preceded the other. It can be argued that special relativity eliminates the concept of absolute simultaneity and a universal present: according to the relativity of simultaneity, observers in different frames of reference can have different measurements of whether a given pair of events happened at the same time or at different times, with there being no physical basis for preferring one frame's judgments over another's. ![]() Both ends of the bar pass through the ring simultaneously in the rest frame of the ring (left), but the ends of the bar pass one after the other in the rest frame of the bar (right). The bar and ring paradox is an example of the relativity of simultaneity. This conventional model presents a number of difficult philosophical problems and may be difficult to reconcile with currently accepted scientific theories such as the theory of relativity. The past and future do not exist and are only concepts used to describe the real, isolated, and changing present. The present does not travel forward through an environment of time, moving from a real point in the past and toward a real point in the future. One view of this type, presentism, argues that only the present exists. In this way time is said to pass, with a distinct present moment moving forward into the future and leaving the past behind. As time passes, the moment that was once the present becomes part of the past, and part of the future, in turn, becomes the new present. Using that representational model, the past is generally seen as being immutably fixed, and the future as at least partly undefined. In classical philosophy, time is divided into three distinct regions: the " past", the " present", and the " future". ![]() It is sometimes referred to as the " block time" or " block universe" theory due to its description of space-time as an unchanging four-dimensional "block", as opposed to the view of the world as a three-dimensional space modulated by the passage of time. Some forms of eternalism give time a similar ontology to that of space, as a dimension, with different times being as real as different places, and future events are "already there" in the same sense other places are already there, and that there is no objective flow of time. In the philosophy of space and time, eternalism is an approach to the ontological nature of time, which takes the view that all existence in time is equally real, as opposed to presentism or the growing block universe theory of time, in which at least the future is not the same as any other time. According to eternalism, those four instants all equally exist. In a common sense view of time, each of those four instants would exist one after another. Time progresses through the series of snapshots from the bottom of the page to the top. Philosophical view that there is no correct way of perceiving the passage of time Illustration of the concept of eternalism, showing a man walking his dog.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |